two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers
#vendor-verification 2024-10-04
Friday27 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- back_from_away — verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently 12:45
- bea_reconstitutes — is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable 13:25
- bea_reconstitutes — while im here does QSC being verified mean my vial is fine a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited 13:54
thats evidence
thin evidence
[edited]what actually counts as evidence for a verification
a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both, we shall see
somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
do blinded submissions carry more weight than open ones
Channel stats, last 30 days: 130 messages from 22 members.
nothing gets deleted
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
the point of the standard is that it applies to suppliers we like as well as ones we do not
how does a supplier get verification revoked
verification has never been for sale and never will be. offers get posted publicly with the sender redacted
does a supplier certificate on its own count for anything
verification is revoked on a confirmed failure and the revocation stays in the log permanently
📈4👍3
is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable
🤝14🔥12👀2
while im here does QSC being verified mean my vial is fine
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
blinded is better
[edited]why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored
post the photos
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited
quick one nothing gets deleted from the log, including our own mistakes
a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all, i have it written down somewhere
is the verification log the same thing as a recommendation
what does not count: the supplier certificate alone, a screenshot, a referral link, or a friend who says it was fine
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more, still working it out
if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score