how does a supplier get verification revoked
#vendor-verification 2024-08-23
Friday34 messages9 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- madrid_mg — has anyone ever offered to pay for verification 03:05
- luerlok — sorry to jump in a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all, still working it out 03:31
- swab_dry_first — two labs disagree on the same lot, which one goes in the log blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs 04:14
- slow.taper — verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more 05:27
- point_two_five — unrelated but a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both 06:15
we refresh on new evidence, not on a clock. an old verification with no recent results says so on the entry
has anyone ever offered to pay for verification
💀5👀8✅1
how many independent results does a supplier need
we have never revoked on a single result. we have revoked on a pattern
thats evidence
while im here somebody once offered to fund the testing programme in exchange for an entry. the offer is in the log
what happens to the log entry when a supplier improves
is there a version of the log i can read chronologically
what actually counts as evidence for a verification
sorry to jump in a referral link is disqualifying because it makes the reporter an interested party. that is all, still working it out
✅7🧪8⚠️10
both numbers go in
[edited]is a screenshot of a report ever acceptable
a verified supplier can still ship you a bad vial. verification is about the record, not about your parcel, anyway
not a recommendation
🤝3🔥1🧊6
does a good result from PeptideMeter outweigh a bad one from Janoshik
two labs disagree on the same lot, which one goes in the log
blinded submissions carry more weight because they remove a variable, not because we distrust the labs
the mods maintain the log. the room supplies the evidence and argues about it, which is the correct division
nothing gets deleted
refresh on evidence
pattern not one result
verification is not a recommendation. it means the evidence standard has been met, nothing more
👀3👍5❤️12
*Janoshik not the other one
why is a referral link disqualifying rather than just ignored
how long does a verification stay current before it needs refreshing
[edited]lot number or nothing
[edited]never for sale
📈1
a supplier improving shows in the log as later entries, not as earlier entries being edited, n of 1 obviously
i have watched this standard hold for three years including when it was inconvenient for a popular supplier
thats not evidence
log it either way
🤝7🔥2
if the evidence is thin the entry says the evidence is thin. that is more useful than a score
ok so two labs a point or two apart on one lot is normal. both go in the log with both numbers
unrelated but a lot number mismatch between the vial and the certificate is a serious finding. post it with photos of both
revoked stays in the log
👀16