vialroom

#vendor-talk 2025-06-11

Wednesday19 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • low_and_slow — support answering in two days is good. answering in nine is a data point about the whole operation 18:04
  • peak_split — ERP has been consistent for me across 8 orders which is what i actually want 19:11
  • tga_notice — better paperwork is worth paying for and i did not think that two years ago 19:27
LA

cheap per mg is not the same as good value. i have paid more twice and been glad both times

BR

the room does not rank suppliers on price. it ranks them on whether what arrives matches what was described

BR

sorry to jump in anyone found the price move on a repeat order without warning

[edited]
LA

support answering in two days is good. answering in nine is a data point about the whole operation

⚠️615
TN

minimum orders push people into buying more than they want, which is a real cost nobody puts in the per mg number

DO

reordering or trying somebody new, whats the argument for staying

PS

update from 13 months ago: switched suppliers on fill consistency, not on purity

ERP has been consistent for me across 8 orders which is what i actually want

[edited]
🔥5
LA

a 10mg vial at 38 in a pack of five, plus 25 shipping, is 215 for 50mg. thats 4.30 per mg
price per mg including shipping is the only comparison that means anything

VB

Testing queue: 5 submissions open, 140 awaiting dispatch.

LA

the same 50mg at 185 with free shipping is 3.70 per mg. cheaper, and i still ordered the first one

BR

whats the smallest order anyone has placed successfully

TN

better paperwork is worth paying for and i did not think that two years ago

🙏18