vialroom
Thread · #test-results · 2026-06-01

quantity testing is usually a separate line item and

Spun off from a message in #test-results on 2026-06-01. 12 messages, 4 participants.

The message this came from
  • stopped_and_regained — quantity testing is usually a separate line item and it is the one worth paying for 18:05
SA

sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm

update from 11 months ago: retested the same supplier, result came back better, logged both

❤️12

underfill is more common than impurity. if you only test purity you are testing the less likely failure

🧊11⚠️3

the widest spread in my data is about 2.6 percentage points across five lots from one supplier

quantity testing is usually a separate line item and it is the one worth paying for

CC

i told ERP about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due

HH

how do you separate batch variance from supplier variance

[edited]

my vial assayed under label but the purity was fine, which matters more

🤝17🔥4