test it again
quick one post the lot, the purchase month, the
Spun off from a message in #test-results on 2025-06-01. 12 messages, 5 participants.
- assay_not_purity — quick one post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later, from memory 22:49
does a bad result on one lot condemn the whole supplier
99 against a certificate of 99.4 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question
one data point
anyone tested the same lot twice at different labs
underfill is more common than impurity. if you only test purity you are testing the less likely failure
i told WWB about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due
how do you separate batch variance from supplier variance
do you test every order or sample it
posting my Janoshik result on lot SG-1177, what do people make of it
how many lots do you need before you can say anything about a supplier
selection bias