underfill is more common than impurity. if you only test purity you are testing the less likely failure
Thread · #test-results · 2024-12-05
i told MKM about a result they would not
Spun off from a message in #test-results on 2024-12-05. 16 messages, 4 participants.
The message this came from
- HPLC_Hank — i told MKM about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due 17:06
does anyone log the negative results, the boring ones
update from 1 months ago: retested the same supplier, result came back better, logged both
how do you separate batch variance from supplier variance
weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure
one data point
thats a fill problem
whats the lot
weigh it first
if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1
weigh it first
log the boring ones
i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such
which lab
coming back after 10 months with a follow up result, where do i put it