Verification log updated: SWB — evidence added, status unchanged.
🧊2💀2
#test-results 2026-06-19
Friday14 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- VialBot — Verification log updated: SWB — evidence added, status unchanged. 20:20
- ten_of_ten — a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by, not advice obviously 20:22
- forty_units — quantity testing is usually a separate line item and it is the one worth paying for 20:25
- ten_of_ten — follow up if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier, your mileage will differ 22:09
is quantity testing available as a separate thing or bundled
a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by, not advice obviously
sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm, n of 1 obviously
quantity testing is usually a separate line item and it is the one worth paying for
💀13🧪6👍13
*VendorInvestigate not the other one
is it worth testing if the vial has already been through a warm transit
👍1
*PeptideMeter not the other one
whats the worst result anyone has logged and what happened next
the widest spread in my data is about 2.6 percentage points across five lots from one supplier
96.8 against a certificate of 99.2 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question, we shall see
[redacted at member request] · archive policy
a single sample tells you about a single vial. that is genuinely all it tells you
follow up if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier, your mileage will differ