is it worth testing if the vial has already been through a warm transit
#test-results 2026-06-06
Saturday16 messages3 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- blind_submit — log the boring results too. a channel that only records failures produces a false picture if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1 17:24
- vialkeeper — a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached, still working it out one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test… 17:25
- vialkeeper — post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later 19:36
- blind_submit — the honest limits: hobby chain of custody is weak and any result here should be read with that in mind 19:37
how do you post a result so it is actually useful to somebody in a year
log the boring results too. a channel that only records failures produces a false picture
if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1
a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached, still working it out
one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally
is quantity testing available as a separate thing or bundled
one data point
is a purity-only test worth the money if underfill is the common failure
if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier
my vial assayed under label but the purity was fine, which matters more
when did you buy it
sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm
i test roughly every tenth vial. it is a sampling strategy, not paranoia
weigh it first
test it again
post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later
[edited]the honest limits: hobby chain of custody is weak and any result here should be read with that in mind
😂1