if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier
#test-results 2026-03-28
- nettle_notes — a supplier disputing a result is rare here and it has never gone well for the supplier 23:16
- warsaw_vial — weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure 23:20
- wrong_network — my sheet has 8 lots from WXT with a spread under a point, which is tight 23:39
- pbs_pip — how do you separate batch variance from supplier variance update from 11 months ago: retested the same supplier, result came back better, logged both 23:54
a supplier disputing a result is rare here and it has never gone well for the supplier
whats the worst result anyone has logged and what happened next
weigh it first
weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure
sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm
log the boring ones
thats a fill problem
has a supplier ever disputed a result posted here
update on the earlier thing coming back after 12 months with a follow up result, where do i put it
*VendorInvestigate not the other one
thats not great
a single sample tells you about a single vial. that is genuinely all it tells you
my sheet has 8 lots from WXT with a spread under a point, which is tight
| Evidence | Counts? |
|---|---|
| Independent report, lot you bought, lot number legible | yes |
| Independent report, no lot number | no |
| Supplier certificate only | no |
| Screenshot of a report | no |
| Blinded pooled submission | yes, for the pool |
| A friend who said it was fine | no |
when did you buy it
[edited]whats the underfill rate people are actually seeing
what interests me is when the gap goes the same direction every time. once is noise, three times is a pattern
how do you separate batch variance from supplier variance
update from 11 months ago: retested the same supplier, result came back better, logged both