post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later
#test-results 2025-12-21
Sunday12 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- sasha_stacks — log the boring results too. a channel that only records failures produces a false picture 13:45
- nine_nine_one — the results in this channel skew because people test when they are suspicious. that is selection bias and it is real 14:13
- sasha_stacks — anyone had a result they think was a lab error rather than a bad vial 14:18
which lab
log the boring results too. a channel that only records failures produces a false picture
✅14
the results in this channel skew because people test when they are suspicious. that is selection bias and it is real
👍1✅9
Recon calculator: 20mg in 2.5ml = 2.5mg/ml.
does a bad result on one lot condemn the whole supplier
selection bias
anyone had a result they think was a lab error rather than a bad vial
chromatogram-overlay.png
1240 × 720 · 337 KB · not retained in the public archive
✅12🧪5
if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1
⚠️2😂4
follow up my read after three years of this: purity is mostly fine across the market and fill consistency is where suppliers differ
nice result
one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally