vialroom

#test-results 2025-12-14

Sunday17 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • turnaround_tam — i have never regretted spending the money on a test. i have regretted not testing twice 20:41
  • orfor_watch — genuine question how many lots do you need before you can say anything about a supplier 21:57
  • underfill_uma — is quantity testing available as a separate thing or bundled 22:40
TT

for the archive the honest limits: hobby chain of custody is weak and any result here should be read with that in mind, not advice obviously
the widest spread in my data is about 2.6 percentage points across five lots from one supplier

TT

certificate said 99.2 and the independent came back 98.6, is that a problem

log the boring results too. a channel that only records failures produces a false picture, thats one data point

log the boring ones

attach the pdf

i have never regretted spending the money on a test. i have regretted not testing twice

🎉11
VB

Archive lookup: orfor_watch first appears in this channel on 2025-08-08.

BS

slightly off topic but the widest spread in my data is about 2.6 percentage points across five lots from one supplier

UU

sorry to jump in posting my Janoshik result on lot H-2814, what do people make of it

OW

genuine question how many lots do you need before you can say anything about a supplier

👍12❤️10

whats the lot

OW

if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1