certificate said 99 and the independent came back 97.4, is that a problem
#test-results 2025-11-15
- area_percent — how do you separate batch variance from supplier variance what interests me is when the gap goes the same direction every time. once is noise, three times is a pattern 21:24
- assay_not_purity — i told SSA about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due 22:49
- VialBot — Archive lookup: fake_tracking first appears in this channel on 2025-01-03. 22:52
anyone had a result they think was a lab error rather than a bad vial
does anyone log the negative results, the boring ones
is a purity-only test worth the money if underfill is the common failure
my read after three years of this: purity is mostly fine across the market and fill consistency is where suppliers differ
the honest limits: hobby chain of custody is weak and any result here should be read with that in mind
how do you separate batch variance from supplier variance
what interests me is when the gap goes the same direction every time. once is noise, three times is a pattern
whats the worst result anyone has logged and what happened next
*Janoshik not the other one
a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by
nice result
coming back to this i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such
which lab
log the boring results too. a channel that only records failures produces a false picture
thats not great
i have never regretted spending the money on a test. i have regretted not testing twice
underfill is more common than impurity. if you only test purity you are testing the less likely failure
attach the pdf
i told SSA about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due
Archive lookup: fake_tracking first appears in this channel on 2025-01-03.
sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm