vialroom

#test-results 2025-09-27

Saturday16 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • tesa_tess — posting my Janoshik result on lot H-2814, what do people make of it 18:53
  • egfr_ed — do you test every order or sample it 20:36
  • egfr_ed — i told KP about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is… 20:37
HH

log the boring results too. a channel that only records failures produces a false picture

VB

Reminder for HPLC_Hank: dose day is today. Set 6 days ago.

TT

posting my Janoshik result on lot H-2814, what do people make of it

😂6🔥4📈4

assay under label with good purity means you got less of the right thing. that is a fill problem, not a synthesis problem

post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later

[edited]
VL

is anyone tracking results over time in a way they would share

EE

a single sample tells you about a single vial. that is genuinely all it tells you

what interests me is when the gap goes the same direction every time. once is noise, three times is a pattern

MO

is a purity-only test worth the money if underfill is the common failure

EE

certificate said 98.6 and the independent came back 98.1, is that a problem

[edited]
MO

do the results in this channel skew because people test when suspicious

if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier

EE

for the archive one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally

do you test every order or sample it

vial-f-1330-front.png
900 × 1200 · 292 KB · not retained in the public archive

i told KP about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due
a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by

⚠️12👀14