weigh it first
#test-results 2025-08-10
Sunday12 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- VialBot — Testing queue: 2 submissions open, 55 awaiting dispatch. 19:49
- oli_orals — anyone had a result they think was a lab error rather than a bad vial 19:50
- oli_orals — i told GL Biochem about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due 20:16
- assay_not_purity — i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such, ask me again in a month one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good… 20:17
a supplier disputing a result is rare here and it has never gone well for the supplier
attach the pdf
posting my Janoshik result on lot A-2418, what do people make of it
Testing queue: 2 submissions open, 55 awaiting dispatch.
😂9
anyone had a result they think was a lab error rather than a bad vial
vial-b-0329-front.png
900 × 1200 · 328 KB · not retained in the public archive
❤️1🙏18📈7
i told GL Biochem about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due
i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such, ask me again in a month
one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally
follow up if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier
*Janoshik not the other one
post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later
thats not great
[edited]| Evidence | Counts? |
|---|---|
| Independent report, lot you bought, lot number legible | yes |
| Independent report, no lot number | no |
| Supplier certificate only | no |
| Screenshot of a report | no |
| Blinded pooled submission | yes, for the pool |
| A friend who said it was fine | no |