when did you buy it
#test-results 2025-08-08
Friday13 messages3 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- vik_verifies — my sheet has 6 lots from TFC with a spread under a point, which is tight 16:04
- vik_verifies — my read after three years of this: purity is mostly fine across the market and fill consistency is where suppliers differ 16:08
- VialBot — Verification log updated: Homopeptide — evidence added, status unchanged. 17:19
- vik_verifies — what interests me is when the gap goes the same direction every time. once is noise, three times is a pattern 17:45
- vik_verifies — assay under label with good purity means you got less of the right thing. that is a fill problem, not a synthesis problem a point or two between the certificate and… 17:46
my sheet has 6 lots from TFC with a spread under a point, which is tight
underfill is more common than impurity. if you only test purity you are testing the less likely failure
[edited]my read after three years of this: purity is mostly fine across the market and fill consistency is where suppliers differ
a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by
has a supplier ever disputed a result posted here
Verification log updated: Homopeptide — evidence added, status unchanged.
log the boring ones
which lab
thats a fill problem
what interests me is when the gap goes the same direction every time. once is noise, three times is a pattern
assay under label with good purity means you got less of the right thing. that is a fill problem, not a synthesis problem
a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by
*PeptideMeter not the other one