vialroom

#test-results 2025-07-08

Tuesday42 messages10 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • ms_ms_mira — 99 against a certificate of 96.8 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question 22:35
  • blank_run — does a bad result on one lot condemn the whole supplier 22:53
  • blank_run — do you test every order or sample it 22:58
UU

my sheet has 2 lots from GL Biochem with a spread under a point, which is tight

MM

the results in this channel skew because people test when they are suspicious. that is selection bias and it is real, someone check my working

BB

how many lots do you need before you can say anything about a supplier

BB

weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure

MM

99 against a certificate of 96.8 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question

🧪611👀13

*Medutest not the other one

the honest limits: hobby chain of custody is weak and any result here should be read with that in mind

the widest spread in my data is about 2.6 percentage points across five lots from one supplier, ask me again in a month

*Janoshik not the other one

what interests me is when the gap goes the same direction every time. once is noise, three times is a pattern

BR

quantity testing is usually a separate line item and it is the one worth paying for

🤝16

one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally, i think

does a bad result on one lot condemn the whole supplier

😂11

one data point

nice result

do you test every order or sample it

⚠️1🧊14💀10

a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached

BB

underfill is more common than impurity. if you only test purity you are testing the less likely failure

weigh it first

update from 25 months ago: retested the same supplier, result came back better, logged both, ill dig out the number

MC

is anyone tracking results over time in a way they would share

log the boring ones

MM

update on the earlier thing a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by

sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm, for what its worth

how do you post a result so it is actually useful to somebody in a year

my result contradicts the supplier certificate, do i tell them

whats the worst result anyone has logged and what happened next

🤝2👍1❤️4

test it again

update on the earlier thing my vial assayed under label but the purity was fine, which matters more

HH

a supplier disputing a result is rare here and it has never gone well for the supplier

MM

assay under label with good purity means you got less of the right thing. that is a fill problem, not a synthesis problem

when did you buy it

VB

On this day 2 years ago this channel logged 119 messages.