vialroom

#test-results 2025-06-22

Sunday31 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • bpc_sceptic — do the results in this channel skew because people test when suspicious 08:04
  • provincial_pat — whats the underfill rate people are actually seeing 08:34
  • provincial_pat — log the boring results too. a channel that only records failures produces a false picture 09:46

log the boring ones

💀98🔥7
MM

a single sample tells you about a single vial. that is genuinely all it tells you

T5

my read after three years of this: purity is mostly fine across the market and fill consistency is where suppliers differ

if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1

unrelated but my sheet has 4 lots from Homopeptide with a spread under a point, which is tight

do the results in this channel skew because people test when suspicious

🧪3📉16📈8

whats the underfill rate people are actually seeing

👍7📉12👀1

how do you post a result so it is actually useful to somebody in a year

sorry to jump in is anyone tracking results over time in a way they would share

PP

update on the earlier thing one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally

log the boring results too. a channel that only records failures produces a false picture

😂14

sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm

the results in this channel skew because people test when they are suspicious. that is selection bias and it is real

T5

i told QSC about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due

AO

unrelated but how many lots do you need before you can say anything about a supplier

ok so i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such

AO

a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by