which lab
#test-results 2025-05-08
- crimp_top — post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later, ask me again in a month 21:10
- crimp_top — does a bad result on one lot condemn the whole supplier 21:31
- blind_submit — quick one underfill is more common than impurity. if you only test purity you are testing the less likely failure, thats one data point 21:34
- secretagogue_sy — weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure 22:02
anyone tested the same lot twice at different labs
coming back to this is it worth testing if the vial has already been through a warm transit
assay under label with good purity means you got less of the right thing. that is a fill problem, not a synthesis problem
when did you buy it
while im here i have never regretted spending the money on a test. i have regretted not testing twice
sorry to jump in i told CPC about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due
one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally
i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such
post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later, ask me again in a month
does a bad result on one lot condemn the whole supplier
has a supplier ever disputed a result posted here
quick one underfill is more common than impurity. if you only test purity you are testing the less likely failure, thats one data point
weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure
while im here is quantity testing available as a separate thing or bundled
how many lots do you need before you can say anything about a supplier
96.8 against a certificate of 99.4 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question
sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm
[edited]is a purity-only test worth the money if underfill is the common failure