vialroom

#test-results 2025-05-08

Thursday18 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • crimp_top — post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later, ask me again in a month 21:10
  • crimp_top — does a bad result on one lot condemn the whole supplier 21:31
  • blind_submit — quick one underfill is more common than impurity. if you only test purity you are testing the less likely failure, thats one data point 21:34
  • secretagogue_sy — weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure 22:02

anyone tested the same lot twice at different labs

AP

coming back to this is it worth testing if the vial has already been through a warm transit

CT

assay under label with good purity means you got less of the right thing. that is a fill problem, not a synthesis problem

when did you buy it

HH

while im here i have never regretted spending the money on a test. i have regretted not testing twice

CT

sorry to jump in i told CPC about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due

CC

one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally

LM

i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such

CT

post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later, ask me again in a month

👀16
CT

does a bad result on one lot condemn the whole supplier

📈15🎉5
BS

quick one underfill is more common than impurity. if you only test purity you are testing the less likely failure, thats one data point

📈18😂1
SS

weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure

📈11

sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm

[edited]
⚠️4📈2
HH

is a purity-only test worth the money if underfill is the common failure