vialroom

#test-results 2025-05-04

Sunday13 messages2 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • sharps_bin_sid — slightly off topic but a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by 16:38
  • sharps_bin_sid — assay under label with good purity means you got less of the right thing. that is a fill problem, not a synthesis problem 16:47
  • sharps_bin_sid — what interests me is when the gap goes the same direction every time. once is noise, three times is a pattern, ask me again in a month 16:48
  • sharps_bin_sid — 99.2 against a certificate of 99 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question 16:53
  • void_volume — one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally 18:01
SB

slightly off topic but a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by

SB

assay under label with good purity means you got less of the right thing. that is a fill problem, not a synthesis problem

what interests me is when the gap goes the same direction every time. once is noise, three times is a pattern, ask me again in a month

if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1

VV

update from 13 months ago: retested the same supplier, result came back better, logged both, ymmv

SB

99.2 against a certificate of 99 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question

👀5

one data point

nice result

does a bad result on one lot condemn the whole supplier

one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally

log the boring results too. a channel that only records failures produces a false picture

test it again

[edited]