vialroom

#test-results 2025-04-19

Saturday25 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • factory_direct_fi — a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by 15:49
  • lead_time_lars — i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such 16:38
  • provincial_pat — certificate said 99 and the independent came back 98.6, is that a problem 17:16
LU

coming back to this does anyone log the negative results, the boring ones

📉11
FD

a point or two between the certificate and an independent result is inside what two labs disagree by

🧪6🙏177
MC

i told Homopeptide about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due, your mileage will differ

RR

update from 13 months ago: retested the same supplier, result came back better, logged both, happy to be corrected

FD

post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later

LT

i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such

🤝1💀18
PP

one bad test does not condemn a supplier. one good test does not clear one. both halves get ignored equally

certificate said 99 and the independent came back 98.6, is that a problem

📈16
PP

a single sample tells you about a single vial. that is genuinely all it tells you

coming back to this how do you separate batch variance from supplier variance

⚠️3👍6

my result contradicts the supplier certificate, do i tell them

whats the lot

18
FD

what interests me is when the gap goes the same direction every time. once is noise, three times is a pattern

LU

assay under label with good purity means you got less of the right thing. that is a fill problem, not a synthesis problem, anyway

FD

coming back to this posting my VendorInvestigate result on lot A-2601, what do people make of it