vialroom

#test-results 2025-04-02

Wednesday19 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • ten_of_ten — sorry to jump in i told CPC about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due 23:12
  • related_subs — anyone had a result they think was a lab error rather than a bad vial 23:19
  • related_subs — 98.1 against a certificate of 97.4 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question 23:25
  • ms_ms_mira — has a supplier ever disputed a result posted here a supplier disputing a result is rare here and it has never gone well for the supplier 23:31
  • area_percent — a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached 23:38
TO

sorry to jump in i told CPC about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due

🎉3🤝14❤️11
RS

if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier

nice result

🔥9

the widest spread in my data is about 2.6 percentage points across five lots from one supplier

anyone had a result they think was a lab error rather than a bad vial

🧪10📉2
TO

how many lots do you need before you can say anything about a supplier

98.1 against a certificate of 97.4 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question

💀17
VB

Testing queue: 9 submissions open, 53 awaiting dispatch.

MM

has a supplier ever disputed a result posted here
a supplier disputing a result is rare here and it has never gone well for the supplier

👀10🤝4🧊15

thats a fill problem

a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached

🔥11

one data point

MM

the results in this channel skew because people test when they are suspicious. that is selection bias and it is real

slightly off topic but i test roughly every tenth vial. it is a sampling strategy, not paranoia, take that with a pinch of salt