sorry to jump in i told CPC about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due
#test-results 2025-04-02
- ten_of_ten — sorry to jump in i told CPC about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due 23:12
- related_subs — anyone had a result they think was a lab error rather than a bad vial 23:19
- related_subs — 98.1 against a certificate of 97.4 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question 23:25
- ms_ms_mira — has a supplier ever disputed a result posted here a supplier disputing a result is rare here and it has never gone well for the supplier 23:31
- area_percent — a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached 23:38
if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier
nice result
the widest spread in my data is about 2.6 percentage points across five lots from one supplier
anyone had a result they think was a lab error rather than a bad vial
how many lots do you need before you can say anything about a supplier
do you test every order or sample it
98.1 against a certificate of 97.4 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question
Testing queue: 9 submissions open, 53 awaiting dispatch.
has a supplier ever disputed a result posted here
a supplier disputing a result is rare here and it has never gone well for the supplier
thats a fill problem
thats within range
a result without a lot number and a purchase date is an anecdote with a pdf attached
one data point
the results in this channel skew because people test when they are suspicious. that is selection bias and it is real
slightly off topic but i test roughly every tenth vial. it is a sampling strategy, not paranoia, take that with a pinch of salt
how do you separate batch variance from supplier variance
selection bias
my result contradicts the supplier certificate, do i tell them