assay under label with good purity means you got less of the right thing. that is a fill problem, not a synthesis problem
📈6
#test-results 2025-03-15
Saturday15 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- wrong_network — assay under label with good purity means you got less of the right thing. that is a fill problem, not a synthesis problem 15:06
- wrong_network — sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm, still working it out 15:12
- VialBot — Inter-lab diff for lot A-2601: 98.6% vs 96.8%. Within expected range. 15:24
which lab
❤️3📉4✅11
whats the lot
❤️16✅6💀1
sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm, still working it out
👍18👀1
quantity testing is usually a separate line item and it is the one worth paying for
my sheet has 9 lots from SWB with a spread under a point, which is tight
the honest limits: hobby chain of custody is weak and any result here should be read with that in mind
weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure
[edited]🤝2
*Janoshik not the other one
anyone tested the same lot twice at different labs
Inter-lab diff for lot A-2601: 98.6% vs 96.8%. Within expected range.
📈14🎉1
log the boring ones
nice result
coming back after 21 months with a follow up result, where do i put it
ok so the results in this channel skew because people test when they are suspicious. that is selection bias and it is real
🤝1