the results in this channel skew because people test when they are suspicious. that is selection bias and it is real, take that with a pinch of salt
#test-results 2025-02-03
- VialBot — Reminder for lot_number_lou: dose day is today. Set 7 days ago. 17:42
- VialBot — New independent result logged — SSA, lot C-4402, purity 96.8% (Medutest). 17:58
- lot_number_lou — the honest limits: hobby chain of custody is weak and any result here should be read with that in mind, thats one data point 18:01
- noct.titrate — how do you post a result so it is actually useful to somebody in a year 18:17
- brisbane_bac — sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm 19:19
Reminder for lot_number_lou: dose day is today. Set 7 days ago.
test it again
when did you buy it
if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier
New independent result logged — SSA, lot C-4402, purity 96.8% (Medutest).
the honest limits: hobby chain of custody is weak and any result here should be read with that in mind, thats one data point
quantity testing is usually a separate line item and it is the one worth paying for
weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure
how do you post a result so it is actually useful to somebody in a year
if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1
whats the lot
*PeptideMeter not the other one
i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such
does anyone log the negative results, the boring ones
is anyone tracking results over time in a way they would share
thats not great
i have never regretted spending the money on a test. i have regretted not testing twice
if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1
weigh it first
log the boring ones
sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm