vialroom

#test-results 2025-02-03

Monday21 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • VialBot — Reminder for lot_number_lou: dose day is today. Set 7 days ago. 17:42
  • VialBot — New independent result logged — SSA, lot C-4402, purity 96.8% (Medutest). 17:58
  • lot_number_lou — the honest limits: hobby chain of custody is weak and any result here should be read with that in mind, thats one data point 18:01
  • noct.titrate — how do you post a result so it is actually useful to somebody in a year 18:17
  • brisbane_bac — sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm 19:19
LN

the results in this channel skew because people test when they are suspicious. that is selection bias and it is real, take that with a pinch of salt

VB

Reminder for lot_number_lou: dose day is today. Set 7 days ago.

when did you buy it

BB

if the vial has been through a bad transit you are testing the transit as much as the supplier

VB

New independent result logged — SSA, lot C-4402, purity 96.8% (Medutest).

LN

the honest limits: hobby chain of custody is weak and any result here should be read with that in mind, thats one data point

🙏1📉4
LN

quantity testing is usually a separate line item and it is the one worth paying for

weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure

*PeptideMeter not the other one

LM

i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such

does anyone log the negative results, the boring ones

👍1🙏2
NT

i have never regretted spending the money on a test. i have regretted not testing twice
if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1

log the boring ones

sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm

medutest-report-b-0114.pdf
3 pages · 425 KB · not retained in the public archive