do the results in this channel skew because people test when suspicious
#test-results 2024-11-25
Monday13 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- tare_weight — is anyone tracking results over time in a way they would share 21:55
- tare_weight — sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm my read after three years of this: purity is mostly fine across the… 21:56
- cold_chain_cmdr — while im here i told FGP about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due 22:37
- dublin_dose — underfill is more common than impurity. if you only test purity you are testing the less likely failure 22:43
post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later
anyone had a result they think was a lab error rather than a bad vial
is anyone tracking results over time in a way they would share
lot bought purity assay/label
A-2418 2025-03 99.1% 9.6 / 10mg
A-2601 2025-08 98.7% 9.8 / 10mg
B-0114 2026-01 99.3% 9.4 / 10mg
B-0329 2026-04 98.9% 9.9 / 10mgsample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm
my read after three years of this: purity is mostly fine across the market and fill consistency is where suppliers differ
is quantity testing available as a separate thing or bundled
test it again
nice result
how much does sample handling on my end affect the number
while im here i told FGP about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due
🎉11
attach the pdf
📈2
one data point
underfill is more common than impurity. if you only test purity you are testing the less likely failure
🔥4🧪1📉5