for the archive weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure
#test-results 2024-11-11
Monday13 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- amsterdam_aliquot — i told Homopeptide about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due, thats just me 11:14
- assay_low_al — 99.4 against a certificate of 96.8 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question, ask me again in a month 11:15
- VialBot — Reminder set. I will post here in 4 days. 11:36
i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such
i told Homopeptide about a result they would not have liked and they did not argue. credit where it is due, thats just me
| Evidence | Counts? |
|---|---|
| Independent report, lot you bought, lot number legible | yes |
| Independent report, no lot number | no |
| Supplier certificate only | no |
| Screenshot of a report | no |
| Blinded pooled submission | yes, for the pool |
| A friend who said it was fine | no |
⚠️14👍2
99.4 against a certificate of 96.8 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question, ask me again in a month
certificate said 98.6 and the independent came back 99, is that a problem
thats not great
log the boring results too. a channel that only records failures produces a false picture, from memory
attach the pdf
a supplier disputing a result is rare here and it has never gone well for the supplier
Reminder set. I will post here in 4 days.
test it again
whats the worst result anyone has logged and what happened next
sample handling on your end absolutely affects it. draw cleanly, ship fast, do not let it sit warm