vialroom

#test-results 2024-06-09

Sunday18 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • luerlok — my sheet has 4 lots from BCH with a spread under a point, which is tight, your mileage will differ 23:16
  • HPLC_Hank — update from 20 months ago: retested the same supplier, result came back better, logged both, ask me again in a month 23:17
  • HPLC_Hank — i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such 23:21
  • area_percent — how do you separate batch variance from supplier variance 23:35
LU

anyone tested the same lot twice at different labs

👀4

my sheet has 4 lots from BCH with a spread under a point, which is tight, your mileage will differ

HH

update from 20 months ago: retested the same supplier, result came back better, logged both, ask me again in a month

🧊8🔥15

selection bias

i had a result i am fairly sure was a handling error on my side and i logged it as such

💀8

is quantity testing available as a separate thing or bundled

thats a fill problem

attach the pdf

weigh it first

for the archive how many lots do you need before you can say anything about a supplier

AP

99.4 against a certificate of 96.8 is fine. the same supplier landing low four times in a row is a question

how do you separate batch variance from supplier variance

🎉2⚠️15🤝9

whats the lot

11
LN

genuine question how much does sample handling on my end affect the number

AP

for the archive i have never regretted spending the money on a test. i have regretted not testing twice, i have it written down somewhere
weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure