vialroom

#test-results 2024-04-07

Sunday19 messages4 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • u100_pat — how do you post a result so it is actually useful to somebody in a year post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes… 08:28
  • mg_per_ml — post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later 09:06
  • u100_pat — my sheet has 3 lots from CPC with a spread under a point, which is tight 09:08
  • retention_time — my read after three years of this: purity is mostly fine across the market and fill consistency is where suppliers differ, we shall see 12:24
MP

if you are testing to settle an argument you will not settle it with n of 1

U1

how do you post a result so it is actually useful to somebody in a year
post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later

MP

while im here anyone tested the same lot twice at different labs

MP

do the results in this channel skew because people test when suspicious

[edited]

post the lot, the purchase month, the lab, the number, and what you were expecting. that makes it useful later

one data point

EvidenceCounts?
Independent report, lot you bought, lot number legibleyes
Independent report, no lot numberno
Supplier certificate onlyno
Screenshot of a reportno
Blinded pooled submissionyes, for the pool
A friend who said it was fineno
RT

weigh the vial before you reconstitute. it costs nothing and catches the common failure

U1

i test roughly every tenth vial. it is a sampling strategy, not paranoia

U1

whats the underfill rate people are actually seeing

thats within range

has a supplier ever disputed a result posted here

U1

the honest limits: hobby chain of custody is weak and any result here should be read with that in mind

thats a fill problem

my read after three years of this: purity is mostly fine across the market and fill consistency is where suppliers differ, we shall see