vialroom

#semaglutide 2026-06-12

Friday47 messages11 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • VialBot — New independent result logged — QSC, lot A-2418, purity 99% (VendorInvestigate). 18:24
  • lot_number_lou — the appetite effect faded for me around 17 months and going up fixed it for a while 20:10
  • fibre_first — five week steps worked better for me than four, purely on how the second week felt 20:40
  • plus_sixteen — anyone gone from 2 straight to 0.25 or is that too big a jump licensed ceiling for weight is 2.4 weekly, anything above that is not a licensed dose 21:38
VB

New independent result logged — QSC, lot A-2418, purity 99% (VendorInvestigate).

VB

Testing queue: 5 submissions open, 12 awaiting dispatch.

AB

coming back to this held at 7.5 and lost 15lb over 19 months, slower than the trials and fine by me

CV

lost about 41kg on the low doses before i even got to 1, which surprised me
compounded and brand felt the same to me at 7.5, which is one person and nothing more

i was wrong about the ceiling for a year, i thought 3 existed. it doesnt for the weight indication

CV

STEP 1 ran to 68 weeks. thats the one everyone half remembers, someone check my working

MW

for the archive if youre comparing brand to compounded, dose accuracy in the vial is the variable, not the molecule

MW

i held at 10 for 5 months and it was the best decision i made

[edited]

STEP is several trials, so saying STEP said x is usually wrong without a number after it

FF

went 1 to 1.7 too fast and spent two weeks regretting it, dropped back and repeated the step, from memory

FF

SELECT was cardiovascular outcomes in people with overweight and existing disease, not a weight trial

VB

On this day 4 years ago this channel logged 122 messages.

CV

changed my mind on the four week rule, i think it depends entirely on how the current dose feels

EM

FLOW was the kidney outcomes trial and it gets quoted in here for things it didnt measure, from memory

CV

vial units and pen clicks are different systems, mixing the two is how people end up wrong
i dont think the plateau is a dose problem most of the time, but i cant prove that

😂1
LN

the appetite effect faded for me around 17 months and going up fixed it for a while

👍9
AB

is the plateau usually appetite coming back or just the scale stopping

AB

licensed ceiling for weight is 2.4 weekly, anything above that is not a licensed dose

the long half life flattens the trough more than people expect, i never felt a day seven dip, anyway

FF

five week steps worked better for me than four, purely on how the second week felt

👍9
FF

the trials titrated on a fixed schedule, most people here dont, worth remembering when comparing

held there too

my Medutest report on the CPC vial came back 97.4 against a certificate saying 96.8

TT

for the archive STEP 4 had the withdrawal arm, thats the one people quote when they talk about stopping

WT

my 5 vial in 2.5ml gives 2.5mg/ml so 0.5 lands on 8 units, thats why i picked that volume

🙏2

*Janoshik not the other one

SH

i dont think the plateau is a dose problem most of the time, but i cant prove that

half life is about a week so youre roughly four to five weeks to steady state on any new dose

anyone compared their 2.5 vial dosing against the pen increments

steady state takes weeks

PS

anyone gone from 2 straight to 0.25 or is that too big a jump
licensed ceiling for weight is 2.4 weekly, anything above that is not a licensed dose

wk 1-4    0.25mg
wk 5-10   0.50mg   (held 2 extra weeks)
wk 11-14  1.00mg
wk 15-26  1.70mg   (held, long)
wk 27+    2.40mg
PS

15 months at 2.4 and the honest summary is diminishing returns after the first half

£240 a month for compounded against what brand costs locally is why most people here use vials, anyway

WT

steady state is the bit people skip, judging a new dose after eight days tells you almost nothing

mine faded too

VB

On this day 4 years ago this channel logged 103 messages.