vialroom

#semaglutide 2024-07-07

Sunday30 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • noct.titrate — 16 months at 2.4 and the honest summary is diminishing returns after the first half 14:44
  • mg_per_ml — does the seven day half life mean the last two days are weaker 15:45
  • rotate_the_site — STEP is several trials, so saying STEP said x is usually wrong without a number after it 15:59
  • typosquat_tay — my PeptideMeter report on the GGPeps vial came back 99 against a certificate saying 99.2 16:15
RT

changed my mind on the four week rule, i think it depends entirely on how the current dose feels

quick one STEP 1 ran to 68 weeks. thats the one everyone half remembers

RT

compounded and brand felt the same to me at 1.7, which is one person and nothing more

PM

i dont think the plateau is a dose problem most of the time, but i cant prove that

[edited]
NT

five week steps worked better for me than four, purely on how the second week felt

RT

genuine question steady state is the bit people skip, judging a new dose after eight days tells you almost nothing

NT

did anybody find a difference between SSA and pharmacy at the same 2.5
26 months at 2.4 and the honest summary is diminishing returns after the first half

i was wrong about the ceiling for a year, i thought 3 existed. it doesnt for the weight indication

the trials titrated on a fixed schedule, most people here dont, worth remembering when comparing

NT

16 months at 2.4 and the honest summary is diminishing returns after the first half

peptidemeter-summary-g-0641.pdf
2 pages · 520 KB · not retained in the public archive

moving my dose day by a day or two never did anything noticeable for me

🧪1

plateaus move

[edited]
🧊14

the long half life flattens the trough more than people expect, i never felt a day seven dip

😂1👍1🙏1
MP

did the STEP 4 withdrawal arm show what i think it showed

does the seven day half life mean the last two days are weaker

🙏17👀1⚠️17

vial units and pen clicks are different systems, mixing the two is how people end up wrong, still working it out

RT

STEP is several trials, so saying STEP said x is usually wrong without a number after it

wk 1-4    0.25mg
wk 5-10   0.50mg   (held 2 extra weeks)
wk 11-14  1.00mg
wk 15-26  1.70mg   (held, long)
wk 27+    2.40mg
TT

my PeptideMeter report on the GGPeps vial came back 99 against a certificate saying 99.2

Trial scheduleWhat most people here do
Step interval4 weeks, fixed4-12 weeks, on symptoms
Holdingprotocol deviationnormal and expected
Top dosereached by designoften never reached
Coming downnot studiedcommon at maintenance
📉1🔥6
RT

my plateau was the scale stopping while appetite stayed suppressed, which is a different problem

RT

going slow cost me nothing except time and saved me two bad weeks, thats my whole contribution
went to 2.4 and the extra suppression wasnt worth the GI for me, so i came back down