we do not name private individuals in this channel. that is why some lines here are redacted
#scam-watch 2026-03-19
- step_one_sian — genuine question a bad batch is not a scam. an underfill is not a scam. slow support is not a scam 12:46
- rotate_the_site — a second payment because the first "did not clear" is the pattern. there is no first payment to clear 13:00
- step_one_sian — ok so do not engage. do not negotiate. do not send a test payment. screenshot and post it 13:09
how do you check a domain is the real one without clicking it
thats the pattern
unrelated but impersonating a real supplier support desk is the pattern that has cost members the most money
if you cannot tell an impersonator from bad support, treat it as an impersonator until you can
the careful version of this channel is worth ten times the angry version
coming back to this i have never seen a real supplier ask for payment to a personal account, ymmv
genuine question a bad batch is not a scam. an underfill is not a scam. slow support is not a scam
thats retail not fraud
a second payment because the first "did not clear" is the pattern. there is no first payment to clear
ok so do not engage. do not negotiate. do not send a test payment. screenshot and post it
certificate looks recycled from another lot, second opinion
report it
report it even if nothing happens. the pattern is the value, not the individual case, n of 1 obviously
redacting that
do not engage
somebody is using the room name to sell things, who do i tell
the careful version of this channel is worth ten times the angry version