vialroom

#scam-watch 2026-03-03

Tuesday37 messages10 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • typosquat_tay — sorry to jump in relabelling and marking up is retail, not fraud. it is a risk profile question, not a crime 15:02
  • two_three_lifts — i was wrong to call something a scam in 2024 and it was a fill problem. i try to remember that 15:04
  • VialBot — Batch lookup D-0718: 7 independent reports on file, earliest 2025-08-24. 17:14
TT

sorry to jump in relabelling and marking up is retail, not fraud. it is a risk profile question, not a crime

👍1😂11
TT

i was wrong to call something a scam in 2024 and it was a fill problem. i try to remember that

👍17🧊2
SC

we do not name private individuals in this channel. that is why some lines here are redacted

no escrow here

coa-h-2814.pdf
1 page · 864 KB · not retained in the public archive

genuine question read the domain character by character. that is the entire defence and it works

certificate looks recycled from another lot, second opinion

TT

update from 22 months ago: the domain from that report is still live and still fake

EE

if you cannot tell an impersonator from bad support, treat it as an impersonator until you can, ask me again in a month

VV

the room holds no money and runs no escrow. anybody offering to is speaking for themselves
i have never seen a real supplier ask for payment to a personal account

JJ

the lookalike domains almost always differ by one doubled letter, a swapped letter, or an added hyphen, someone check my working

thats retail not fraud

VV

a chromatogram that appears on two different lots is forged. not sloppy, forged

genuine question how do you tell an impersonator from a genuinely bad support experience

VB

Batch lookup D-0718: 7 independent reports on file, earliest 2025-08-24.

a second payment because the first "did not clear" is the pattern. there is no first payment to clear

fraud means somebody set out to take your money or deceive you about what is in the vial. keep the words separate

no names please

unrelated but coming back after 9 months, is the watchlist still maintained

sorry to jump in do not engage. do not negotiate. do not send a test payment. screenshot and post it

TY

a discount that expires in an hour is a pressure tactic and it is the oldest one there is
a reply from a different address than the one you wrote to is worth stopping over

EE

quick one this certificate has the same chromatogram as one from two years ago

TT

impersonating a real supplier support desk is the pattern that has cost members the most money

someone claiming to be support for QST contacted me first, real or not