read the domain character by character. that is the entire defence and it works
#scam-watch 2025-09-12
- logrotate — update from 1 months ago: the domain from that report is still live and still fake the watchlist is pinned and maintained. add anything you find with a screenshot 19:16
- nine_nine_one — if you cannot tell an impersonator from bad support, treat it as an impersonator until you can 21:08
- chlorhex — a chromatogram that appears on two different lots is forged. not sloppy, forged 21:28
update from 1 months ago: the domain from that report is still live and still fake
the watchlist is pinned and maintained. add anything you find with a screenshot
somebody is relabelling and marking up, is that a scam or just retail
the watchlist is pinned and maintained. add anything you find with a screenshot
how do you tell an impersonator from a genuinely bad support experience
certificate looks recycled from another lot, second opinion
got an unsolicited message offering a discount, is this a known thing
somebody is using the room name to sell things, who do i tell
while im here a second payment because the first "did not clear" is the pattern. there is no first payment to clear
someone claiming to be support for TFC contacted me first, real or not
is an underfilled vial fraud or a bad batch
report it
redacting that
a reply from a different address than the one you wrote to is worth stopping over
a discount that expires in an hour is a pressure tactic and it is the oldest one there is
anyone recognise this pattern, a discount that expires in an hour
thats retail not fraud
how do you check a domain is the real one without clicking it
read it character by character
is a bad batch ever grounds for calling something a scam
classic advance fee
relabelling and marking up is retail, not fraud. it is a risk profile question, not a crime
while im here a fake tracking number that resolves on no carrier at all is conclusive. one that resolves and stalls is not, we shall see
they asked for a second payment because the first one "did not clear"
we do not name private individuals in this channel. that is why some lines here are redacted
if you cannot tell an impersonator from bad support, treat it as an impersonator until you can
tracking number does not resolve on any carrier, is that a fake
do not engage. do not negotiate. do not send a test payment. screenshot and post it
thats a bad batch not fraud
the reply came from a different address than the one i wrote to, is that normal
impersonating a real supplier support desk is the pattern that has cost members the most money
a bad batch is not a scam. an underfill is not a scam. slow support is not a scam, i think
a chromatogram that appears on two different lots is forged. not sloppy, forged
no escrow here
nobody legitimate contacts you unsolicited offering a discount. report it, do not reply, thats just me
the lookalike domains almost always differ by one doubled letter, a swapped letter, or an added hyphen, not advice obviously
impersonating a real supplier support desk is the pattern that has cost members the most money
report it even if nothing happens. the pattern is the value, not the individual case