vialroom

#scam-watch 2025-03-23

Sunday42 messages11 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • endotoxin_ed — someone claiming to be support for QSC contacted me first, real or not 09:09
  • VialBot — Reminder set. I will post here in 8 days. 10:09
  • meal_prep_mick — is it worth reporting or does nothing happen 11:00
  • meal_prep_mick — tracking number does not resolve on any carrier, is that a fake 11:02

follow up coming back after 14 months, is the watchlist still maintained

how do you check a domain is the real one without clicking it

a fake tracking number that resolves on no carrier at all is conclusive. one that resolves and stalls is not

EE

someone claiming to be support for QSC contacted me first, real or not

📉4
BN

the lookalike domains almost always differ by one doubled letter, a swapped letter, or an added hyphen, i have it written down somewhere

relabelling and marking up is retail, not fraud. it is a risk profile question, not a crime

BN

follow up a bad batch is not a scam. an underfill is not a scam. slow support is not a scam

SS

i was wrong to call something a scam in 2024 and it was a fill problem. i try to remember that

SS

fraud means somebody set out to take your money or deceive you about what is in the vial. keep the words separate

thats a bad batch not fraud

redacting that

the watchlist is pinned and maintained. add anything you find with a screenshot, ymmv

tracking number does not resolve on any carrier, is that a fake

🎉10👀13⚠️2

no names please

🙏10👍111

thats retail not fraud

CC

if you cannot tell an impersonator from bad support, treat it as an impersonator until you can

is a hyphenated version of a real domain always fake

[edited]
FA

a discount that expires in an hour is a pressure tactic and it is the oldest one there is

FA

impersonating a real supplier support desk is the pattern that has cost members the most money

MO

this certificate has the same chromatogram as one from two years ago

U1

a second payment because the first "did not clear" is the pattern. there is no first payment to clear

FA

the careful version of this channel is worth ten times the angry version

i have never seen a real supplier ask for payment to a personal account

U1

we do not name private individuals in this channel. that is why some lines here are redacted

advance payment for a "reservation", has anyone seen this pattern

MP

read the domain character by character. that is the entire defence and it works