does the glucagon arm explain the heart rate or

logging rhr daily

i went up too fast, got a fortnight of nothing but nausea, and dropped back two steps

logging rhr daily

phase 2 doses are published and theyre not far off what people here run, coincidence rather than plan

phase 2 only

watching my heart rate

why does everyone insist on smaller steps here than on the other two

whats a sensible starting point, im seeing everything from 0.5 to 2

came off at 12 weeks because my resting rate stayed elevated and i didnt like it

triple agonist, GLP-1 and GIP and glucagon. the glucagon arm is the part with no long history

i said 8 months ago that my heart rate had settled and it has stayed settled since

stepping in 0.5 increments instead of doubling is the only thing i would change if i started again

smaller steps here

settled by month three