vialroom

#retatrutide 2026-02-19

Thursday52 messages11 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • reta_resting_hr — the honest position is this has less human evidence behind it than anything else discussed here 20:47
  • reta_resting_hr — anyone compared their PeptideMeter purity across two different SGN lots 20:56
  • still_here_2024 — whats the half life like, is it weekly the same way 22:35
TT

nobody should read my log as a plan, im recording what i did and thats all it is, take that with a pinch of salt

AP

i was wrong to call the heart rate a non issue last year, enough people logged it that i changed my mind

low and slow here means smaller steps than i ever used on tirzepatide, thats the received wisdom, thats one data point

🎉3

appetite suppression at 15 was stronger than my tirzepatide experience at a comparable point, not advice obviously

TT

sorry to jump in the phase 2 weight result was larger than what the earlier agonists reported, in a smaller shorter trial

SB

GI was about the same as tirzepatide for me, the difference was how fast it arrived

is the glucagon arm what people mean by the energy expenditure thing

NN

stopped for 20 months and restarted at half my old dose, the ramp was easier second time

the honest position is this has less human evidence behind it than anything else discussed here

📈1318

i went up too fast, got a fortnight of nothing but nausea, and dropped back two steps

TT

held at 1.7 for 1 months and it never plateaued for me, which i cant explain

i said 9 months ago that my heart rate had settled and it has stayed settled since, someone check my working

RR

anyone compared their PeptideMeter purity across two different SGN lots

👀3❤️9
RR

the purity spread across lots worries me more than the molecule does, your mileage will differ

NN

people insist on small steps because the side effects arrive faster than on the other two

VB

Verification log updated: ERP — evidence added, status unchanged.

🧊4

does the glucagon arm explain the heart rate or is that unrelated

TT

phase 2 was still trending at the end which is why the phase 3 readout matters more than usual

AP

the glucagon arm is the mechanistic story for extra energy expenditure and its still a story to me

TT

there is no long term safety data, phase 2 and an ongoing phase 3 programme is what exists

low and slow

AP

i log resting heart rate every morning because of this and its the one number i actually watch

[edited]
💀5👍2❤️9
TT

the heart rate thing is real enough that i mention it whenever someone asks about starting

⚠️1🔥8
SB

Janoshik came back 98.6 on one lot and 99 on the next from the same Homopeptide, both fine
triple agonist, GLP-1 and GIP and glucagon. the glucagon arm is the part with no long history

did the phase 2 result actually come in higher than the tirzepatide numbers

*Janoshik not the other one

came off at 18 weeks because my resting rate stayed elevated and i didnt like it

AP

is TRIUMPH the phase 3 programme
energy expenditure isnt something i could feel, though my sleep tracker disagreed with me

baseline  58
wk 2      61
wk 4      64
wk 6      67
wk 8      66
wk 10     65   (held dose from wk 7)
SH

research use only
no idea whether the heart rate settles for everyone, mine did and one log isnt data

research use only is on every vial and i treat it as exactly that, nobody here is prescribing, someone check my working

🧪1💀2
SB

buying this is a completely different risk conversation from the licensed compounds and that gets said too rarely

phase 2 doses are published and theyre not far off what people here run, coincidence rather than plan, ask me again in a month