anyone gone above 2.5 and what changed
#retatrutide 2025-12-06
Saturday43 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- night_pin — anyone logging resting heart rate on this blood pressure stayed flat for me while heart rate moved, which i didnt expect 21:05
- typosquat_tay — coming back to this how long before people saw the first change at 12 21:17
- food_noise_off — does the glucagon arm explain the heart rate or is that unrelated 23:21
i went up too fast, got a fortnight of nothing but nausea, and dropped back two steps
cant feel it honestly
anyone logging resting heart rate on this
blood pressure stayed flat for me while heart rate moved, which i didnt expect
👀7⚠️3💀2
smaller steps here
Reminder set. I will post here in 7 days.
settled by month three
coming back to this how long before people saw the first change at 12
🧪3🎉6
genuine question blood pressure stayed flat for me while heart rate moved, which i didnt expect
⚠️2👍1
how do people square the research use only framing with logging their own use
anyone stayed at 1.7 for months rather than climbing
low and slow here means smaller steps than i ever used on tirzepatide, thats the received wisdom
stopped for 17 months and restarted at half my old dose, the ramp was easier second time
is there any long term safety data at all or is it phase 2 and hope
buying this is a completely different risk conversation from the licensed compounds and that gets said too rarely
no long term data
🤝1
energy expenditure isnt something i could feel, though my sleep tracker disagreed with me
research use only
unrelated but whats a sensible starting point, im seeing everything from 0.5 to 2
phase 2 only
my resting rate went up 9 bpm in the first month and came back most of the way by month 11
triple agonist meaning GLP-1, GIP and glucagon, have i got that right
stopped for 2 months and restarted at half my old dose, the ramp was easier second time
the half life supports weekly dosing and thats what ive done from the start
i was wrong to call the heart rate a non issue last year, enough people logged it that i changed my mind
people insist on small steps because the side effects arrive faster than on the other two
sat at 10 for 8 months rather than climbing and it kept working, so i never went up
[edited]TRIUMPH is the phase 3 programme, thats the name to search rather than the molecule, not advice obviously
im at 2.5 and the appetite effect is stronger than i expected, normal
mine went up too
Channel stats, last 30 days: 18 messages from 28 members.
phase 2 doses are published and theyre not far off what people here run, coincidence rather than plan
how slow is low and slow here, four weeks a step or longer
i said 3 months ago that my heart rate had settled and it has stayed settled since
logging rhr daily
i said 9 months ago that my heart rate had settled and it has stayed settled since
whats the half life like, is it weekly the same way
glucagon is the new bit
✅4🧪1
held mine ages
TRIUMPH is phase 3
fridge-temps.csv
601 rows · not retained in the public archive
anyone tracking blood pressure alongside the heart rate
anyone reconstituting 15 vials to 2.5 so the steps come out smaller
does the glucagon arm explain the heart rate or is that unrelated
transit-times.csv
334 rows · not retained in the public archive
low and slow