anyone stayed at 2.5 for months rather than climbing
#retatrutide 2025-09-29
Monday40 messages9 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- otto_swirls — anyone compared their Janoshik purity across two different QYB lots 17:16
- otto_swirls — no idea whether the heart rate settles for everyone, mine did and one log isnt data, we shall see 18:22
- VialBot — Verification log updated: GL Biochem — evidence added, status unchanged. 19:19
- VialBot — Purity check: no report on file for lot A-2418. Nothing logged either way. 22:41
held mine ages
my resting rate went up 3 bpm in the first month and came back most of the way by month 1
i said 2 months ago that my heart rate had settled and it has stayed settled since
Recon calculator: 40mg in 1.5ml = 2.5mg/ml.
watching my heart rate
anyone compared their Janoshik purity across two different QYB lots
site-rotation-map.png
1000 × 700 · 502 KB · not retained in the public archive
does the glucagon arm explain the heart rate or is that unrelated
energy expenditure isnt something i could feel, though my sleep tracker disagreed with me
anyone gone above 0.5 and what changed
follow up research use only is on every vial and i treat it as exactly that, nobody here is prescribing
🔥4📈1
glucagon is the new bit
triple agonist yeah
phase 2 doses are published and theyre not far off what people here run, coincidence rather than plan
did the phase 2 plateau or was it still moving at the end
i log resting heart rate every morning because of this and its the one number i actually watch
🙏5🧪1👀3
appetite suppression at 1 was stronger than my tirzepatide experience at a comparable point
settled by month three
there is no long term safety data, phase 2 and an ongoing phase 3 programme is what exists, ask me again in a month
people insist on small steps because the side effects arrive faster than on the other two
fridge-thermometer.png
800 × 800 · 206 KB · not retained in the public archive
no idea whether the heart rate settles for everyone, mine did and one log isnt data, we shall see
baseline 58
wk 2 61
wk 4 64
wk 6 67
wk 8 66
wk 10 65 (held dose from wk 7)reconstituted the 40 vial to 5mg/ml specifically so i could take 0.5 without measuring crumbs, anyway
phase 2 was still trending at the end which is why the phase 3 readout matters more than usual
low and slow
TRIUMPH is phase 3
✅14
quick one how do people square the research use only framing with logging their own use
the half life supports weekly dosing and thats what ive done from the start
update on the earlier thing stopped for 19 months and restarted at half my old dose, the ramp was easier second time
the honest position is this has less human evidence behind it than anything else discussed here
Verification log updated: GL Biochem — evidence added, status unchanged.
phase 2 only
🎉6💀1
the glucagon arm is the mechanistic story for extra energy expenditure and its still a story to me
nobody should read my log as a plan, im recording what i did and thats all it is
right so anyone reconstituting 40 vials to 8 so the steps come out smaller
how slow is low and slow here, four weeks a step or longer
🧊4👍2
im at 1.7 and the appetite effect is stronger than i expected, normal
is the phase 2 dosing anywhere near what people here run
does the energy expenditure claim show up as anything you can feel
the honest position is this has less human evidence behind it than anything else discussed here
Purity check: no report on file for lot A-2418. Nothing logged either way.
🔥10