sorry to jump in how long before people saw the first change at 2
#retatrutide 2025-08-25
Monday46 messages11 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
Channel stats, last 30 days: 26 messages from 23 members.
how do people square the research use only framing with logging their own use
👍1⚠️11
anyone compared their PeptideMeter purity across two different FGP lots
[edited]why does everyone insist on smaller steps here than on the other two
Recon calculator: 15mg in 3ml = 5mg/ml.
unrelated but held at 7.5 for 13 months and it never plateaued for me, which i cant explain, your mileage will differ
TRIUMPH is the phase 3 programme, thats the name to search rather than the molecule
anyone tracking blood pressure alongside the heart rate
low and slow here means smaller steps than i ever used on tirzepatide, thats the received wisdom, ill dig out the number
energy expenditure isnt something i could feel, though my sleep tracker disagreed with me
the heart rate thing is real enough that i mention it whenever someone asks about starting
how slow is low and slow here, four weeks a step or longer
nobody should read my log as a plan, im recording what i did and thats all it is
[edited]👍1
if the trial went up to 12mg why does everyone here talk about 2 and 3
because the trial had monitoring and we have a bathroom scale and a watch
best answer to that question ive seen
✅14
also because the phase 2 tested escalation speed as a variable. the slower schemes existed for a reason
getting to a high dose fast was clearly worse tolerated. that is in the published data, not folklore
so whats the community ladder
there isnt an official one and im wary of writing one down. what most of the long term logs here look like is roughly this
| Weeks | Dose | What people report |
|---|---|---|
| 1–4 | 1 mg | often nothing much at all |
| 5–8 | 1–2 mg | appetite change starts |
| 9–16 | 2 mg | most people could stop here and be fine |
| 17–24 | 3 mg | HR usually shows up in this band |
| 25+ | 4 mg or hold | many hold, some climb slowly |
and that is a description of a log, not a protocol. nobody in here is telling you to follow it
correct, thats why i hedged
i did 1mg for eight weeks because i was nervous and it was still the fastest three months of loss ive ever had
at 1mg. which the trial called the low arm
the low arm still beat placebo by a wide margin. people forget that entirely
👀10
so why is anyone at 8 or 12
because 24% is a very loud number and people are impatient
and because a few of them genuinely do need more. thats real too
how do you know which you are
you hold a dose for eight weeks and look at the slope. if it is still going down you did not need more
the most common mistake i see in these logs is escalating during a month that was working
put that on the channel wall
🎯15📌4
brb school run
what about supply, does the quality vary more on this one
wildly, historically. the WuXi TIDES material ive tested came back clean on identity and content both times
identity is the bit that matters most here. read #coa-reading, half the reta problems in 2024 were identity not purity
does Medutest cover reta
some of it. cross reference with a lot specific assay, never rely on an aggregate review for a compound this counterfeited
and the standing reminder. this is research material, not approved for people, and there is no year three safety data for anyone to hide behind
the honest summary is that the efficacy signal is the most impressive thing in the field and the safety picture is 48 weeks long
back. and yeah, thats why im still at 1mg fourteen months later
your eight week slope rule — does that work if youre also changing food and training at the same time
no. it works badly. change one thing at a time or you learn nothing, which is most peoples actual problem
the real titration ladder is patience and nobody wants to climb it
😂7