smaller steps here
#retatrutide 2025-03-30
Sunday22 messages5 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- a1c_lag — GI was about the same as tirzepatide for me, the difference was how fast it arrived, i think 13:46
- fridge_thermo — genuine question buying this is a completely different risk conversation from the licensed compounds and that gets said too rarely, i think 13:56
- fridge_thermo — phase 2 was still trending at the end which is why the phase 3 readout matters more than usual 14:20
research use only
logging rhr daily
settled by month three
👀12✅1📈1
GI was about the same as tirzepatide for me, the difference was how fast it arrived, i think
🧊14📉17
research use only is on every vial and i treat it as exactly that, nobody here is prescribing
is the glucagon arm what people mean by the energy expenditure thing
nobody should read my log as a plan, im recording what i did and thats all it is, still working it out
cant feel it honestly
genuine question buying this is a completely different risk conversation from the licensed compounds and that gets said too rarely, i think
anyone gone above 0.25 and what changed
people insist on small steps because the side effects arrive faster than on the other two
stepping in 7.5 increments instead of doubling is the only thing i would change if i started again
[edited]low and slow
energy expenditure isnt something i could feel, though my sleep tracker disagreed with me
phase 2 was still trending at the end which is why the phase 3 readout matters more than usual
⚠️15📉13📈2
TRIUMPH is phase 3
triple agonist meaning GLP-1, GIP and glucagon, have i got that right
watching my heart rate
anyone reconstituting 2 vials to 8 so the steps come out smaller
is the GI worse than tirzepatide or about the same
held mine ages
[edited]how do people square the research use only framing with logging their own use