phase 2 was still trending at the end which is why the phase 3 readout matters more than usual
#retatrutide 2024-08-01
- mg_per_ml — triple agonist, GLP-1 and GIP and glucagon. the glucagon arm is the part with no long history 13:07
- back_from_away — slightly off topic but phase 2 doses are published and theyre not far off what people here run, coincidence rather than plan, ymmv 14:23
- customs_owl — genuine question is TRIUMPH the phase 3 programme 14:24
- customs_owl — TRIUMPH is the phase 3 programme, thats the name to search rather than the molecule, happy to be corrected 15:21
did the phase 2 plateau or was it still moving at the end
how long before people saw the first change at 0.25
triple agonist, GLP-1 and GIP and glucagon. the glucagon arm is the part with no long history
low and slow here means smaller steps than i ever used on tirzepatide, thats the received wisdom
sorry to jump in sat at 0.25 for 2 months rather than climbing and it kept working, so i never went up
glucagon is the new bit
low and slow
does the energy expenditure claim show up as anything you can feel
held mine ages
im at 15 and the appetite effect is stronger than i expected, normal
nobody should read my log as a plan, im recording what i did and thats all it is, ill dig out the number
settled by month three
why does everyone insist on smaller steps here than on the other two
anyone tracking blood pressure alongside the heart rate
slightly off topic but phase 2 doses are published and theyre not far off what people here run, coincidence rather than plan, ymmv
genuine question is TRIUMPH the phase 3 programme
smaller steps here
people insist on small steps because the side effects arrive faster than on the other two
whats the half life like, is it weekly the same way
coming back to this how do people square the research use only framing with logging their own use
TRIUMPH is the phase 3 programme, thats the name to search rather than the molecule, happy to be corrected