vialroom

#retatrutide 2024-07-20

Saturday21 messages6 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • blind_submit — anyone compared their Medutest purity across two different CPC lots 19:59
  • blind_submit — anyone stayed at 7.5 for months rather than climbing 20:14
  • drawup_dee — PeptideMeter came back 97.4 on one lot and 98.6 on the next from the same Homopeptide, both fine 20:18
  • area_percent — how long before people saw the first change at 12 22:02
AP

the honest position is this has less human evidence behind it than anything else discussed here, thats just me

research use only is on every vial and i treat it as exactly that, nobody here is prescribing, thats just me

BS

no idea whether the heart rate settles for everyone, mine did and one log isnt data

BS

anyone compared their Medutest purity across two different CPC lots

anyone stayed at 7.5 for months rather than climbing

baseline  58
wk 2      61
wk 4      64
wk 6      67
wk 8      66
wk 10     65   (held dose from wk 7)
DD

nobody should read my log as a plan, im recording what i did and thats all it is
stopped for 20 months and restarted at half my old dose, the ramp was easier second time

settled by month three

PeptideMeter came back 97.4 on one lot and 98.6 on the next from the same Homopeptide, both fine

did the phase 2 result actually come in higher than the tirzepatide numbers

ok so i was wrong to call the heart rate a non issue last year, enough people logged it that i changed my mind

while im here why does everyone insist on smaller steps here than on the other two

i went up too fast, got a fortnight of nothing but nausea, and dropped back two steps

VB

Inter-lab diff for lot B-0329: 96.8% vs 99%. Within expected range.

PN

phase 2 was still trending at the end which is why the phase 3 readout matters more than usual

AP

how long before people saw the first change at 12

baseline  58
wk 2      61
wk 4      64
wk 6      67
wk 8      66
wk 10     65   (held dose from wk 7)