vialroom

#retatrutide 2024-07-03

Wednesday22 messages7 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
  • ferrous_ash — research use only is on every vial and i treat it as exactly that, nobody here is prescribing 02:25
  • ferrous_ash — energy expenditure isnt something i could feel, though my sleep tracker disagreed with me, i could be wrong 02:49
  • subq_sy — stepping in 1.7 increments instead of doubling is the only thing i would change if i started again 06:19
  • subq_sy — how long before people saw the first change at 15 07:00
CC

VendorInvestigate came back 99.4 on one lot and 98.1 on the next from the same QSC, both fine

FA

research use only is on every vial and i treat it as exactly that, nobody here is prescribing

👀13

low and slow

came off at 33 weeks because my resting rate stayed elevated and i didnt like it

CC

low and slow here means smaller steps than i ever used on tirzepatide, thats the received wisdom

🔥3
FA

energy expenditure isnt something i could feel, though my sleep tracker disagreed with me, i could be wrong

🎉15
FA

im at 1 and the appetite effect is stronger than i expected, normal

[edited]
VB

Digest for the week of 2024-01-01 has been published.

📈3
MP

the half life supports weekly dosing and thats what ive done from the start, thats one data point

MP

appetite suppression at 0.25 was stronger than my tirzepatide experience at a comparable point

MP

how slow is low and slow here, four weeks a step or longer

GI was about the same as tirzepatide for me, the difference was how fast it arrived

[edited]
SS

stepping in 1.7 increments instead of doubling is the only thing i would change if i started again

janoshik-e-2205.pdf
2 pages · 761 KB · not retained in the public archive
MP

my resting rate went up 5 bpm in the first month and came back most of the way by month 25

SS

how long before people saw the first change at 15

😂12
SS

the glucagon arm is the mechanistic story for extra energy expenditure and its still a story to me

phase 2 only