verification channel has some
Thread · #other-peptides · 2024-10-22
no long term human safety data for most of
Spun off from a message in #other-peptides on 2024-10-22. 14 messages, 4 participants.
The message this came from
- salt_bridge — no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past 15:00
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
did nothing for me
ran one thing at a time for 8 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 14 months and never came back
💀2🎉2
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
❤️16🤝10
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
🧊1⚠️1
Medutest came back 98.6 on a WWB lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
👀2📈10
ran TB-500 alone for 12 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
📉5✅10
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult