#other-peptides 2026-06-29

sceptical but curious

is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones

unrelated but anyone reconstituted a 20 vial of these to 4 and had it stay clear

anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something

the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them

coming back to this i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back

cant tell honestly

is stacking three things at once ever defensible

injuries heal anyway

GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting

ran TB-500 alone for 4 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened, i think

if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it, take that with a pinch of salt

GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser

TB-500 did nothing for me over 30 weeks and i stand by that a year later, happy to be corrected

anyone had a purity result under 97.4 on one of these

genuine question people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this

rodent data only

Batch lookup KP-0925: 5 independent reports on file, earliest 2025-10-09.

one thing at a time

my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time

genuine question purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99.4 on one lot and 99.2 on another, we shall see

PeptideMeter came back 99 on a BCH lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works, thats one data point

placebo maybe

anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline

i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included, from memory

is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything