the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
🤝1🙏9👍3
#other-peptides 2026-06-21
Sunday60 messages14 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- gall_bladder_gav — the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else 08:14
- gall_bladder_gav — is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it 08:15
- ida_injects — does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time 09:49
- wren_weighs_in — is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating 10:56
- subq_sy — how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing 14:39
is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
🧪10🔥4
ran one thing at a time for 4 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
update on the earlier thing the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
ran it alone
🤝1
are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
the secretagogue effect faded for me after about 25 months and never came back
gall_bladder_gavthe honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation…
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
quick one changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
injuries heal anyway
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
unrelated but oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
👍1🧪2
ran GHK-Cu for 6 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
👍2✅1📉2
back after 11 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 4.8 degrees
gall_bladder_gavran one thing at a time for 4 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them…
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
⚠️17🧊1🔥1
cant tell honestly
Inter-lab diff for lot H-2814: 98.6% vs 97.4%. Within expected range.
😂1
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
i stacked three things for 1 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything
anyone had a purity result under 99.2 on one of these
coming back to this one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks, ask me again in a month
is there any human data on BPC-157 or is it all rodent work
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
🔥12💀11
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
[edited]GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
does tesamorelin need the same cold chain care as the GLP-1s
🙏6📉4
GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
did nothing for me
genuine question does anyone have a PeptideMeter result for a ERP BPC lot
anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
came back after 10 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
one thing at a time
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
rodent data only
no human data
reconstituted 40 in 0.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
wren_weighs_incoming back to this one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in…
Medutest came back 99.4 on a HJ lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
the scepticism here is because the evidence is thin, not because people are being difficult
slightly off topic but purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 96.8 on one lot and 99.2 on another
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
TB-500 did nothing for me over 25 weeks and i stand by that a year later
stacked, learned nothing
is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
genuine question is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
📈3👀13🧊2
is stacking three things at once ever defensible
does anyone log these the way people log doses in the other channels
*Janoshik not the other one
ok so evidence is thin
🧪16🧊15
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it