for the archive anyone reconstituted a 5 vial of these to 2 and had it stay clear
#other-peptides 2026-06-18
Thursday54 messages13 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- tga_notice — if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it 14:21
- VialBot — Inter-lab diff for lot D-0718: 98.6% vs 99.2%. Within expected range. 14:43
- invoice_mismatch — tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling, happy to be corrected 15:07
no human data
[edited]ok so tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
🔥1
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
📈11💀13🔥5
TB-500 did nothing for me over 8 weeks and i stand by that a year later
injuries heal anyway
did nothing for me
Inter-lab diff for lot D-0718: 98.6% vs 99.2%. Within expected range.
🔥5✅1
cant tell honestly
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling, happy to be corrected
✅1❤️5🧊2
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
evidence is thin
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something
*Janoshik not the other one
is there a reason this channel is so much more sceptical than the compound ones
update on the earlier thing GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
[edited]sorry to jump in came back after 24 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted, anyway
baseline month helped
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 97.4 on one lot and 99 on another
stacked, learned nothing
how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
TB-500 did nothing for me over 4 weeks and i stand by that a year later
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 3.1 degrees
update on the earlier thing took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
🙏1
one thing at a time
ran it alone
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
get it tested
[edited]i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
*VendorInvestigate not the other one
rodent data only
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
quick one secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
ran TB-500 alone for 18 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
ran GHK-Cu for 2 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
is stacking three things at once ever defensible
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
while im here are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
On this day 2 years ago this channel logged 73 messages.
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
ran GHK-Cu for 12 weeks and stopped because i couldnt tell, which is a result of a kind
tesamorelin has a licensed indication and everything outside it is us extrapolating
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
placebo maybe
🧊17
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
reconstituted 15 in 2ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
i stacked three things for 9 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
sceptical but curious
ran one thing at a time for 4 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
Medutest came back 99.2 on a SWB lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works, ask me again in a month
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve, thats just me
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting