anyone had a purity result under 99 on one of these
#other-peptides 2026-06-09
Tuesday13 messages3 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- bpc_sceptic — if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it 21:54
- juno_joins — tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling 21:55
- juno_joins — reconstituted 2 in 0.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with 22:01
- bpc_sceptic — no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past, ask me again in a month 22:53
- bpc_sceptic — BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing 23:25
evidence is thin
[edited]baseline month helped
if youre going to run something, run it long enough and alone, otherwise dont bother logging it
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
*VendorInvestigate not the other one
anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline
back after 15 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
reconstituted 2 in 0.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
anyone run TB-500 on its own rather than stacked with something
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past, ask me again in a month
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included