did nothing for me
[edited]#other-peptides 2026-06-02
- per_mg_pete — while im here how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway 22:29
- ghk_gia — one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks 22:54
- VialBot — Testing queue: 7 submissions open, 18 awaiting dispatch. 23:31
- meal_prep_mick — my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time 23:39
ran TB-500 alone for 2 weeks specifically so i could attribute anything that happened
i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
quick one are secretagogues worth it if you sleep badly anyway
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
while im here how do you separate healing from time when the injury was going to heal anyway
[edited]does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 98.6 on one lot and 97.4 on another, for what its worth
i log these exactly like doses, date, amount, site, what i noticed, and its still hard to read back
evidence is thin
coming back to this is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
how long do people run TB-500 before deciding it did nothing
update on the earlier thing the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy, thats just me
baseline month helped
cant tell honestly
no human data
the verification channel takes these, its just that far fewer people submit them
one thing at a time
while im here how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 98.1 on one lot and 96.8 on another
one variable at a time or you learn nothing, which is unpopular in a channel full of stacks
[edited]came back after 1 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted
is stacking three things at once ever defensible
placebo maybe
stacked, learned nothing
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
rodent data only
sceptical but curious
verification channel has some
genuine question GHK-Cu did something to my skin texture and i cannot rule out that it was the moisturiser
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
injuries heal anyway
while im here reconstituted 20 in 2.5ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
no long term human safety data for most of these, which is the sentence people skip past
the honest split is that some of these have licensed uses and some have a reputation and nothing else
TB-500 did nothing for me over 24 weeks and i stand by that a year later
does the verification channel cover these or only the GLP-1s
changed my mind on stacking, i used to defend it and now i think it just makes a log unreadable
took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log
Testing queue: 7 submissions open, 18 awaiting dispatch.
people get pointed at verification because purity is the only measurable part of any of this
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 4.8 degrees, ill dig out the number
*Janoshik not the other one
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing