does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
#other-peptides 2026-05-12
- chlorhex — anyone reconstituted a 2 vial of these to 5 and had it stay clear 19:52
- declared_value — the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support 20:55
- declared_value — purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 97.4 on one lot and 99.2 on another 21:37
- chlorhex — PeptideMeter came back 97.4 on a MKM lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works 22:22
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
i stacked three things for 26 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy, thats one data point
rodent data only
anyone reconstituted a 2 vial of these to 5 and had it stay clear
no human data
reconstituted 5 in 1ml and it stayed clear for the whole vial, which is the low bar we work with
back after 10 months, has any actual data landed on BPC
stacked, learned nothing
i was confident BPC did something for my elbow and a year later im not, injuries resolve
the tendon claims trace back to a small number of animal studies that get cited well past what they support
cold chain matters for anything reconstituted whatever it is, mine live at 5.6 degrees
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 97.4 on one lot and 99.2 on another
TB-500 did nothing for me over 2 weeks and i stand by that a year later
PeptideMeter came back 97.4 on a MKM lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
how many weeks is a fair run for GHK-Cu topically