the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy, still working it out
💀18👍14🤝5
#other-peptides 2026-05-03
Sunday28 messages8 participantstimes are UTC
Highlights from this day
- bpc_sceptic — the labs will run purity on most of these, its identity and content, not efficacy, still working it out 19:38
- ferritin_fay — nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing 19:48
- truncation_tru — update on the earlier thing i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included 21:08
- hr_log_hattie — tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling 22:02
anyone got a before and after on GHK-Cu that isnt just lighting
nobody here can tell you whether BPC will help your injury and anyone who does is guessing
😂10💀2🎉18
right so took a full month off everything to get a baseline and it was the most useful month of my log, not advice obviously
is the secretagogue appetite increase a real effect or dose dependent
🙏1💀18
oral BPC is a different question from injected and the two get discussed as if theyre the same
is the tendon stuff anecdote or is there something behind it
[edited]get it tested
came back after 5 months off and my baseline was where it was before, so nothing persisted, happy to be corrected
my shoulder got better on BPC and it also got better across six weeks of rest i took at the same time
GHK-Cu is the one where photos would help and nobody ever controls the lighting
coming back to this i stacked three things for 10 months and the honest conclusion is that i learned nothing
📉2
anyone stopped everything for a month to get a baseline
sceptical but curious
injuries heal anyway
🙏11
secretagogues made me ravenous, which is a fairly direct signal that something was happening
slightly off topic but whats a sensible way to tell whether a stack did anything at all
anyone had a purity result under 98.6 on one of these
purity varies more on these than on the GLP-1s in my experience, 99.4 on one lot and 98.1 on another, thats just me
is BPC-157 oral or does it need injecting to do anything
update on the earlier thing i think most of what gets reported here is regression to the mean, my own reports included
🎉15📈3❤️13
PeptideMeter came back 99 on a SSA lot, which tells you whats in the vial and nothing about whether it works
BPC-157 human evidence is close to absent, the rodent work is extensive and thats a different thing
does GHK-Cu do anything you can actually see
🔥3📉1🙏10
ran one thing at a time for 7 years and ended up with three conclusions, two of them boring
tesamorelin was the only one where i could point at a measured change rather than a feeling
🎉17💀2
is the human evidence thin or genuinely absent
🤝5📈3
anyone tried one variable at a time here or is everyone stacking